Frege-Geach problem and metaethical expressivism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The problem with the Frege–Geach problem
I resolve the major challenge to an Expressivist theory of the meaning of normative discourse: the Frege–Geach Problem. Drawing on considerations from the semantics of directive language (e.g., imperatives), I argue that, although certain forms of Expressivism (like Gibbard’s) do run into at least one version of the Problem, it is reasonably clear that there is a version of Expressivism that do...
متن کاملExpressivism and Contrary-forming Negation
A well known challenge faced by any version of metaethical expressivism is to provide an adequate treatment of the so-called Frege-Geach problem. The task is to make sense of logically complex sentences like 'If I insulted the host then I ought to apologize', to do so by making sense of the states of mind such sentences would be used to express, and to preserve the validity of intuitively valid...
متن کاملA problem for expressivism
Language, Truth and Logic added expressivism to the inventory of substantive positions in meta-ethics, and the recent defences of versions of it by Simon Blackburn and Allan Gibbard have enhanced its status as a major position. 1 Ayer presented the doctrine as an improvement on subjectivism – that is, on the doctrine that ethical sentences serve to report attitudes of approval and disapproval –...
متن کاملWhy the Negation Problem Is Not a Problem for Expressivism
In 1999, Unwin introduced a puzzle about expressivism and negation. He showed that existing accounts of expressivism cannot accommodate even the simplest case of negated normative judgments involving the permissible, the required, and the forbidden. Since descriptivist accounts of normative language do not have a problem accommodating these cases, Unwin believed that the problem was a problem s...
متن کاملMetaethical Contextualism
An important function of language is to create and develop interpersonal relationships in communication. In inquiry we share and coordinate our beliefs about how the world is. But we also take a stance and socially orient ourselves toward possible acts, attitudes, and states of affairs. We evaluate possibilities as desirable, appropriate, horrible, trivial, permissible, wonderful. We make deman...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Theoria, Beograd
سال: 2008
ISSN: 0351-2274,2406-081X
DOI: 10.2298/theo0802049c